...it's not dark yet, but it's gettin' there...
Quickly. Green Bay at Seattle. Green Bay sucks hard. Ten point underdogs. I followed a pattern last time, which proved true. However, if I follow it again, the chart would tell me that GB wins, and I lose if I bet for GB. They being 10 point underdogs, the pattern breaks down. It's illogical because it tells me I must bet against GB in order to win, but there's no way I can win by betting against them if they win as underdogs. Understand? Therefore, I will assume that the pattern of WLWLWL for GB's last six MNF appearances will be broken tonight (a logical assumption, since they suck hard, see above), and take Seattle minus the points, and see what happens.
Update: A push! Ha-ha, a muthafucken PUSH!
Flawless reasoning my dear, but what about the Hawk factor?
Posted by: Casca on Nov. 27, 2006What is your take on the al-Maliki/Ahmadinejad meeting? On Iranian influence (covert and overt) overall?
Posted by: will on Nov. 28, 2006STFU, collect your nasty smelly socks, and go the fuck away. You that feel compelled to engage this miserable piece of shit should STFU too.
NOT-SAFE-FOR-WORK!!!1
American Skankwoman Update
http://thesuperficial.com/2006/11/britney_spears_really_wants_yo.html
It's hard to believe that I once wanted to fap to that. giggity giggity giggity
Oooo, that's gotta be chilly.
Posted by: Casca on Nov. 28, 2006First rule of image rehabilitation: Do not hang out with Paris Hilton.
Posted by: annika on Nov. 28, 2006