...it's not dark yet, but it's gettin' there...

February 16, 2004

Why i Can't Watch The Debates

i watched the democrats debate each other for three minutes and i had to turn it off. Never mind the lies and demagoguery, they offended me by their ignorance of history.

On the eve of Presidents Day, John Edwards said that three of our great wartime presidents had no military experience: Woodrow Wilson, FDR and Abraham Lincoln. Wrong. Abraham Lincoln was a captain in the Illinois militia during the Blackhawk War of 1832. He volunteered and served 90 days, which may seem short, but the war only lasted four months.

John Kerry, who's whole candidacy revolves around his military experience, said that Vietnam was our nation's longest war. Wrong. Vietnam was 1961 to 1975, fourteen years. Some historians date The Plains Indian Wars from the 1854 Grattan Massacre to Sitting Bull's surrender in 1881. That's twenty-seven years. Other historians might even extend it nine more years to 1890 and the Battle of Wounded Knee.

Other things bothered me too. i loved how Kerry said: "There's only one thing wrong with the Patriot Act. Two words: John Ashcroft." Well, i wonder how Mr. Kerry can explain why he voted for it then, since John Ashcroft was Attorney General at the time.

Then there's the tired old line about how the prescription drug benefit is only a way to give tax money to the drug companies and the HMOs. Somebody please explain to me how else that program is supposed to work. Instead of the money coming from the elderly, now it comes from the government. Somebody has to pay for the drugs. Did they expect the pharmaceutical companies to give the stuff away for free?

Update: Another excellent point at Blather Review.

Posted by annika, Feb. 16, 2004 |
Rubric: annikapunditry



Comments

"There's only one thing wrong with the Patriot Act. Two words: John Ashcroft."

So if Kerry is elected and appoints a new attorney general who proceeds to use the powers of the Patriot Act In the exact manner as the current administration, that would be O.K.?

So the widespread (alleged) trampling of individual rights would be OK if done by anyone other than Ashcroft? Or would it only be O.K. if done by a Democrat?

Posted by: Stephen Macklin on Feb. 16, 2004

"i wonder how Mr. Kerry can explain why he voted for it then, since John Ashcroft was Attorney General at the time."

That's particularly damning given that Kerry rarely shows up to vote at all. At 28%, I'd be quite surprised if any Senator has a worse attendance record.

But he was in Vietnam (did you know?), so it's all OK.

Posted by: Dave J on Feb. 16, 2004

Too busy counting his wife's money or porking some intern.

Posted by: annika! on Feb. 16, 2004

Are the Dems offering "free sex and drugs for everyone"? And annie dear, isn't "banging" more ladylike than "porking"?

Posted by: d-rod on Feb. 16, 2004

i like the ugliness of the term "porking" in this context. The image of botox-boy having sex is about as ugly an image as i can think of.

"Bring . . . it . . . on."

Posted by: annika! on Feb. 16, 2004

Ewwww. That's practically as bad as thinking about my parents. [shudder]

Posted by: Dave J on Feb. 17, 2004

"Did they expect the pharmaceutical companies to give the stuff away for free?"

If they thought they could get away with it, yes, that's precisely what they'd like the law to require. Capitalism is bad, Annie! Hasn't anyone told you?

Posted by: Matt Rustler on Feb. 19, 2004